Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts

Aug 17, 2010

Big mistake on the Internet World Stats is an International website

I so surprised when I access internetworldstats.com. On the "Top 20 countries with the highest number of users" table, Vietnam became Vietnem. It's a serious mistake. I don't know why?


We know that, Internet World Stats is an International website is very useful where we can find a lot of information such as Internet Usage, Population Statistics and Internet Market Research Data, for over 233 individual countries and world regions.

Now, we can believe  Internet World Stats is an International website anymore?

Apr 24, 2010

I Think Facebook Just Seized Control Of The Internet

by MG Siegler on Apr 21, 2010


The opening keynote at Facebook’s f8 conference today in San Francisco was short and sweet. But don’t let that fool you. It contained some huge announcements pertaining to how the service will interact with the broader web going forward. The three big ones: social plugins, Open Graph, and Open Graph API, make Facebook’s intentions very clear: they want to be the fabric of the web.
Erick already outlined Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s perspective on this from his keynote, but perhaps more interesting was some of what Platform Lead Bret Taylor had to say. The most interesting thing Taylor said was that Facebook’s stance is that social connections are going to be just as important going forward as hyperlinks have been for the web. Obviously, as the largest social network, Facebook to some degree has to believe (or at least say) that. But today, and really over the past several months of huge growth, Facebook has given us all a reason to believe that may be the case.
And if that’s so, Google had better watch out. There may be a new sheriff in web town.
Right off the bat, Zuckerberg rattled off some impressive numbers. While we all know that Facebook has over 400 million users (and it appears to be approaching 500 million rapidly), he also said that the service is growing at a faster rate than ever before. That’s fairly insane. He also noted that while it took the service 5 years to get to 100 million users, it took only 3 years to reach the same total in terms of mobile users. And in the past year, they seen that number grow 3x. Perhaps most impressive of all is that in just one year, Facebook got 100 million people using Facebook Connect. And that’s why everything they announced today has a real shot at completely transforming the web. Because everything they’ve announced (and specifically, Open Graph) seems to be like Facebook Connect on steroids.
All of this may sound grandiose and a bit frightening, but that’s why it’s ingenious the way Facebook is using Taylor. As he explained on stage today, Taylor used to work on a “small social network called FriendFeed” (which, of course, Facebook acquired last year). While he’s now a key member of Facebook’s team leading this new strategy, he used some of his keynote today to talk about his experience working on a startup with Facebook Connect.
He noted that at FriendFeed they found that the key to getting users to stick around and keep them using the site was that they had to connect with five friends. Unfortunately, when you’re a startup with not very many users, that’s extremely hard to do (yes, even just five). So FriendFeed implemented all types of logins and email contact lookups to try and help users find friends. The key to FriendFeed’s growth was Facebook Connect, as users were four times more likely to become engaged users if they signed up through that service, he said. In fact, if FriendFeed has continued on as an independent service, “we would have removed all those other signup buttons,” Taylor said. Yes, that includes Twitter and Google.
And lest you think his experience with Connect was all peachy, Taylor went on to explain that FriendFeed was constantly frustrated with how difficult Facebook Connect was to implement into their site. This is something that many developers have echoed over the past year. But with the new social plugins announced today, that all changes, Taylor promised. “I didn’t think the platform needed to be this complex,” he said. And now, apparently, it isn’t.
So that’s Taylor selling Facebook’s Open Graph to thousands of startups out there. And many are likely to bite. There’s no denying that social graphs are the key to a service being sticky, and there is no better social graph than Facebook’s.
Companies will have to choose whether to fight against this, and attempt to launch their own graph, or get in line. “When we connect our graphs together, the web is gonna get a whole lot better,” Zuckerberg promised.
Facebook launched some of this social plugin and Open Graph integration with several (30) large partners today. Just clicking around the web earlier, I ran into the new “like” button on CNN. It’s excellent; much better than the current share buttons which are slow and clunky in comparison.
In my opinion, Facebook still has a ways to go towards improving its actual site if it’s really going to be the long-term center of the web. (As in, the place you go to rather than Google.com.) But its claws for pulling in outside content are now razor-sharp. It’s going to be very hard for anyone to escape.
Over the next several days and weeks, we’ll undoubtedly hear why that’s a bad thing. Maybe it is. But maybe, if Facebook plays its cards right, the web will be a bit better because it will be more connected. Of course, that’s a lot of power for a still-private company to have. Let’s hope they know what they’re doing, and aren’t evil.
[photos: flickr/ingridtaylar and flickr/alan vernon]
Read more: http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/21/facebook/#ixzz0lyuygFbV

Feb 5, 2010

win-win situation is not enough: new www model


Today, many people think about win-win situation. However, when I discuss with our friends about "How could we development a small social networks",  I found that wasn't enough.  We must be recognized the role and  impacts of customer/audience and that's growing up. Please, think and care our customers.

Jan 30, 2010

HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog


The numbers this fall aren't good.
After a high above 14,000 last year, the Dow is now thrashing around well below 9,000. The U.S. government is spending over $700 billion to buy unprecedented stakes in the nation's largest banks. Many industries, including technology, are hemorrhaging jobs.
This post isn't about all that. It's about the silver lining -- the fact that, just as we saw eight years ago when the first Internet bubble burst, financial pressure is now forcing companies to make changes. And just like last time, these changes are laying the foundation for a new, more efficient period of Internet growth.
In 2001, when the last downturn began, businesses began shifting some of their marketing dollars to search engine advertising. It was more measurable and targeted than display advertising, so it was appealing to marketers with tight budgets.

 
As we enter a second Internet downturn, businesses are again seeking efficiency. They're shifting money out of expensive paid search advertising, and into optimization, content and social media that help them get found in organic search results.
These changes are laying the foundation for a new era of marketing on the web - the Inbound Marketing era.

What Is Inbound Marketing?

Inbound Marketing is marketing focused on getting found by customers.
In traditional marketing (outbound marketing) companies focus on finding customers. They use techniques that are poorly targeted and that interrupt people. They use cold-calling, print advertising, T.V. advertising, junk mail, spam and trade shows.
Technology is making these techniques less effective and more expensive. Caller ID blocks cold calls, TiVo makes T.V. advertising less effective, spam filters block mass emails and tools like RSS are making print and display advertising less effective. It's still possible to get a message out via these channels, but it costs more.
Inbound Marketers flip outbound marketing on its head.
Instead of interrupting people with television ads, they create videos that potential customers want to see. Instead of buying display ads in print publications, they create their own blog that people subscribe to and look forward to reading. Instead of cold calling, they create useful content and tools so that people call them looking for more information.
Instead of driving their message into a crowd over and over again like a sledgehammer, they attract highly qualified customers to their business like a magnet.

inbound marketing

The most successful Inbound Marketing campaigns have three key components:
(1) Content - Content is the substance of any Inbound Marketing campaign. It is the information or tool that attracts potential customers to your site or your business.
(2) Search Engine Optimization - SEO makes it easier for potential customers to find your content. It is the practice of building your site and inbound links to your site to maximize your ranking in search engines, where most of your customers begin their buying process.
(3) Social Media - Social media amplifies the impact of your content. When your content is distributed across and discussed on networks of personal relationships, it becomes more authentic and nuanced, and is more likely to draw qualified customers to your site.

inbound marketing
 


Why Inbound Marketing Makes Sense in a Recession

As the economy slows down, companies are turning to Inbound Marketing because it is a more efficient way of allocating marketing resources than traditional, outbound marketing. As our CEO, Brian Halligan, puts it, when you're inbound marketing, the thickness of your brain matters a lot more than the thickness of your wallet.
There are three specific ways Inbound Marketing improves on the efficiency of traditional marketing:
(1) It Costs Less - Outbound marketing means spending money - either by buying ads, buying email lists or renting huge booths at trade shows. Inbound Marketing means creating content and talking about it. A blog costs nothing to start. A Twitter account is free, too. Both can draw thousands of customers to your site.  The marketing ROI from inbound campaigns is higher.
(2) Better Targeting - Techniques like cold-calling, mass mail and email campaigns are notoriously poorly targeted. You're reaching out to individuals because of one or two attributes in a database. When you do Inbound Marketing, you only approach people who self-qualify themselves. They demonstrate an interest in your content, so they are likely to be interested in your product.
(3) It's an Investment, Not an Ongoing Expense - When you buy pay-per-click advertising on search engines, its value is gone as soon as you pay for it. In order to maintain a position at the top of Google's paid results, you have to keep paying. However, if you invest that money in quality content that ranks in Google's organic results, you'll be there until somebody displaces you.

The Roots of the Inbound Web

Only in the past year and a half have the technology, the tools and the public's use of both evolved to the point where Inbound Marketing is practical.
In the early days of the Internet, there was no mainstream marketing. There were lots of experiments but few business buyers and consumers.
In the mid-1990s, as the first Internet bubble grew, companies began to follow their customers online. Tools for independent publishing were weak, so companies' online presence mirrored their offline presence. They sprayed advertising across mass media sites and prayed a few potential customers would see it.
When the dot-com bubble popped in 2001, marketers began to reassess the effectiveness of the spray-and-pray approach. They saw that consumers and business buyers were starting their purchase process less on mass media sites, and more on search engines. They discovered that in many cases targeted search-engine advertising was far more effective than display advertising on large media sites.
As spending poured into search marketing, a new era of Internet growth began. In addition to changes in Internet marketing, this phase of growth -- Web 2.0 -- produced significant changes in the way we use the web. It shifted from a read-only platform to one where anybody could publish, connect with friends and share content.
Now, as we enter a new economic downturn, online marketers are using the tools of this new read-write web to become more efficient. They're using social media, they're publishing content and they're optimizing it. They're becoming Inbound Marketers.

The Inbound-Marketing Secret? Empowerment!


Eight years ago, when the dot-com bubble collapsed, the idea of a single man using great content, social media and search engine optimization to build a New Jersey liquor store into a $50-million-a-year business in the course of two years would have been absurd.
Yet that's exactly what Gary Vaynerchuk has done since he launched Wine Library TV in 2006.
This is the power of Inbound Marketing.
With the tools that have become mainstream over the last two to three years, the scale of any business can be unlimited. If you have a great product and the skills to communicate with your customers, you can compete with the biggest advertising budgets.
That is exciting, and for small businesses it's empowering.


Posted by Rick Burnes on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 @ 09:01 AM

Jan 17, 2010

Top U.S. Web Brands and Site Usage: December 2009


January 14, 2010
The Nielsen Company today reported December 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.
Top 10 Parent Companies/Divisions for December 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)
RankParentUnique Audience (000)Time Per Person (hh:mm:ss)
1Google155,6832:21:53
2Microsoft135,8762:03:01
3Yahoo!130,2292:56:27
4Facebook109,9056:24:17
5AOL LLC88,3472:25:09
6News Corp. Online80,1521:18:15
7Amazon74,4280:35:26
8InterActiveCorp71,5640:15:44
9eBay67,9791:23:31
10Apple Computer63,8251:27:45
Source: The Nielsen Company
Example:  The data indicates that 63.8 million home and work Internet users visited at least one of the Apple Computer-owned sites or launched an Apple Computer-owned application during the month, and each person spent, on average, a total of 1 hour, 27 minutes and 45 seconds at one or more of their sites or applications.
The parent level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs owned by a single company or division. The brand level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.
Top 10 Web Brands for December 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)
RankBrandUnique Audience (000)Time Per Person (hh:mm:ss)
1Google146,7001:40:55
2Yahoo!129,0322:56:35
3Facebook109,9056:24:17
4MSN/WindowsLive/Bing108,1741:56:43
5YouTube92,5101:09:38
6Microsoft91,3660:44:39
7AOL Media Network88,3472:25:09
8Amazon66,4720:33:37
9Apple63,8251:27:45
10Fox Interactive Media61,5181:31:50
Source: The Nielsen Company

Average U.S. Internet Usage, Combined Home & Work, Month of December 2009
MetricsDec-09
Sessions/Visits per Person51
Domains Visited per Person83
Web Pages per Person2,614
PC Time per Person64:09:12
Duration of a Web Page Viewed0:00:56
Active Digital Media Universe195,738,178
Current Digital Media Universe Estimate234,802,000
Source: The Nielsen Company


China's Internet Users Up 30% YoY to 384M


Written by Matt McDougall  

China added 86 million users in 2009 to reach a total of 384 million Internet users by December 30, up 28.9% from late 2008, according to a report released January 15 by the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). China added 120 million mobile Internet users in the year to reach a total of 233 million, representing 60.8% of all Internet users, CNNIC said.


Domestic broadband users reached 346 million by the end of 2009, 76 million more than that of 2008. Rural Internet users accounted for 28.7% of the users, up 26.3% year-on-year, according to the announcement.



Despite a disparity in Internet use between the urban and rural areas, Internet users in rural areas reached 106.8 million by the end of 2009, an increase of 26.3 percent from 2008. The most frequent online practices included listening to music, reading news, and doing searches, said the report. Though China's Internet users are engaged more in recreational activities, they are gradually shifting to consumption related practices, including tourism reservations, online stock playing, and e-banking, which respectively registered increases of 77.9 percent, 67 percent, and 62.3 percent respectively. China added 40 million users in the first six months of 2009 to reach a total of 338 million Internet users by June 30, up 13.4% from late 2008.

Source: CNNIC

Jan 8, 2010

What’s Your Online Content Worth? Global Consumers Say: It Depends

January 5, 2010

Across countries, demographics and content types, consumers have diverse attitudes about paying for content online.
Nic Covey, Director of Cross-Platform Insights, The Nielsen Company
The big question in the new Internet decade is whether consumers will pay for content online.  It turns out that millions of global consumers are, in fact, willing to pay up… but not for everything.  For example, consumers are three times as likely to pay for online music than for a blog.
Consumers weigh in
Nielsen recently conducted a global survey of more than 27,000 consumers in 54 countries to examine attitudes about paying for online content and to determine which content types consumers were most willing to support financially.  The findings show that many consumers are willing to pay for online content or are open to increased advertising to pick up the costs, but attitudes vary greatly by geography, demographics and content type.
Paying for (perceived) quality
Consumers show a higher propensity to pay for music, movies, games and professionally produced video than for podcasts, blogs or consumer generated video.  This validates the notion that consumers globally still place more value on content produced by “professionals” than by other consumers.  Likewise, they are more inclined to spend money on what they already pay for, rather than on what they currently get for free.
Percent of global online consumers who have paid OR would consider paying for various types of content online – Fall 2009
Content
Music57%
Theatrical movies57%
Games51%
Professional produced video (including current television shows)50%
Magazines49%
Newspapers42%
Internet-only news sources36%
Radio (Music)32%
Podcasts28%
Social communities28%
Radio (News/Talk)26%
Consumer-generated video24%
Blogs20%
Source: The Nielsen Company.  n=27,548
While it may seem obvious that consumers are more willing to pay for professional content than amateur, the reality shouldn’t be taken for granted: to consumers, not all content is created equal.
Bring on the ads (in the Middle East, at least)
Overall willingness to pay for online content may surprise some, but more surprising yet is the extent to which consumers in some markets are still open to more advertising.  Nearly half (47%) of global respondents said they would put up with more ads to subsidize free content, but that willingness swings by market.

While 57% of respondents in the Middle East, Africa and Pakistan are open to the more advertising – as are 55% of those in Asia Pacific – just 40% of North America respondents and 39% of European respondents agree.
Later this month we’ll release the broader findings of this study.  The paper will reveal many of the regional, demographic and content nuances of willingness to pay for online content.  The key takeaway is this: across geographies, demographics and content types, consumers think very differently about how they’ll pay for content.  Accordingly, monetization models will have to be flexible – there will have to be more, not fewer, options to supporting the cost of content.
Predictions

  • The future of monetization will include a much broader range of revenue models than exist today
  • Good and useful content will always find patrons.
A timely conversation
On Friday, January 8, at the International Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas, I’ll join a panel of colleagues to discuss “Predictions and Opportunities for Media Monetization.” CES is an appropriate place to have this conversation: there we’ll see the latest tech gadgets that will offer consumers even more anytime, anywhere access to both free, and paid content.

Dec 28, 2009

Internet Users Spend 13 Hours/Week Online



Adult internet users in the US are now spending an average of 13 hours a week online, and half of adult internet users have purchased something online in the last month, according tothe results from a recent poll from Harris Interactive.
Online Time Increases Over Years
The Harris Poll found that over the years the average number of hours spent online has increased from seven hours in 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002, to between eight and nine hours in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006.
In 2007, weekly time online increased to 11 hours. Last year (in October after the financial crisis broke and before the presidential election) internet users were online for 14 hours per week, double the amount of time spent 1999 to 2002, the poll found.
harris-interactive-online-home-work-other-location-trends-1995-2009.jpg
Online Time a Factor of Age
Despite these high overall usage numbers, people’s usage still varies greatly, said Harris Interactive. The poll revealed that one in five (20%) adult internet users are online for only two hours or less a week while one in seven (14%) are spending 24 or more hours a week online.
Not surprisingly, the tendency to be online varies by age. The age groups that spend the most time online are those ages 30-39 (18 hours) and those aged 25-29 (17 hours) and 40-49 (17 hours):
harris-interactive-hours-spent-each-week-by-age-december-2009.jpg
Half Purchase Online

Half (50%) of all those online bought something on the internet in the last month. This includes 62% of those ages 30-39 and 56% of those ages 40-49.
harris-interactive-purchased-online-last-month-by-age-december-2009.jpg
184 Million Online
The number of adults online, now 184 million (80%), has not changed significantly since 2008 and 2007, noted Harris Interactive.  This includes those online at work, at home, at school or any other locations. However, the number of adults who are online at home has increased to 76% this year, and 75% last year, compared with 70% in 2006, and 66% in 2005.
harris-interactive-estimated-numbers-adults-online-us-millions-december-2009.jpg
Harris Interactive noted that the increase in the number of hours spent online in the last two years compared with all previous years is striking and likely reflects a growing ability to use the internet, an increase in sites and applications, increased TV watching online and increased purchasing online. Hours online also may have increased because of the recession, since going online is, in many cases, more economical than going out.
About the poll: This Harris Poll was conducted by telephone within the US July 7-12 and October 13-18, 2009 among 2,029 adults (ages 18+). Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region, number of adults in the household, number of phone lines in the household were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population.

Dec 20, 2009

Where Do the 65+ Go Online


by Dick Stroud on 17 December, 2009 - 22:18

The secret is out. Most of them go nowhere and the rest go to just about the same place as you and me.
According to the NielsenWire Online, in the US the 65+ still make up less than 10% of the active Internet universe, although in the last five years their number has increased by more than 55%. Interestingly, the increase of women online has outpaced the growth of men by 6%.

Time spent on the Internet by increased 11% and now stands at over 58 hours per week in 2009.

The research director, at Nielsen's online notes that: "The over 65 crowd represents about 13% of the total population and... they're engaged in many of the same activities that dominate other age segments - e-mail, sharing photos, social networking, checking out the latest news and weather... (in addition) a good percentage of them are spending time with age-appropriate pursuits such as leisure travel, personal health care and financial concerns."
The next time somebody asks you the question you have the answer.