Jan 31, 2010

The evolution of Marketing Communication

Created by Hai Le


This is my 3|C model.
Today, marketing 2.0 likes a circle in which it have three components (Corporation, Channels, and Customer).
First, It's not like a separate marketing campaigns. Marketing 2.0 is the continuous processing where marketer must keep track everything on real-time. The marketers have role as a stock brokers. They spent a lot of time for monitor the marketing and they try to understand and forecast the market.
Second, audiences will not passive anymore. Audiences can choose a contents that they need and want. They also is the decision maker that content's good or bad. For example, social bookmarking is the where user evaluation the contents. Hence, marketers can't use push strategy anymore. 
Third, two-way communication is the serious requirement. 
Fourth, the relationship between corporation and customer will be more strength. That's the effect of two-way and real-time communication. 

Jan 30, 2010

New Data on Twitter’s Users and Engagement

[To keep up with our latest research and updates, follow us on Twitter @RJMetrics]

Since my guest post on TechCrunch last fall, I’ve received frequent requests to update and expand upon myTwitter data analysis. As the Twitter API continues to improve, our ability to profile the company from the outside-looking-in becomes even stronger. I recently conducted an updated round of analysis and will be posting my findings in a series of posts here at The Metric System in the coming weeks.
Updating this analysis in RJMetrics was just a matter of a few clicks, and we could easily highlight the most interesting tidbits of new information. If you’d like that level of control of your own business’s data, you should try out our demo to learn more.
Today, I’m starting with an update of the basics: users and engagement.

Results Summary

We analyzed data through the end of 2009. Where the data overlapped with our previous analysis (which ran through August 2009), the findings were highly consistent. However, the updated data revealed the following noteworthy trends:
  • Twitter ended 2009 with just over 75 million user accounts.
  • The monthly rate of new user accounts peaked in July 2009 and is currently around 6.2 million new accounts per month (or 2-3 per second). This is about 20% below July’s peak rate.
  • A large percentage of Twitter accounts are inactive, with about 25% of accounts having no followers and about 40% of accounts having never sent a single Tweet.
  • About 80% of all Twitter users have tweeted fewer than ten times.
  • Only about 17% of registered Twitter accounts sent a Tweet in December 2009, an all-time-low.
  • Despite these facts, Twitter users are becoming more engaged over time when we control for sample age.

How We Did It (Again)

We are not associated with Twitter in any way and have no direct access to their backend data. However, we do have access to their API. This allowed us to take advantage of a few unique characteristics of the Twitter data set:
  • A Twitter user’s activity data (tweets, followers, etc) is all public by default
  • Twitter’s API allowed us to automatically download up to 20,000 data points per hour
  • Twitter uses auto-incrementing ID numbers (1,2,3,4…) for both users and tweets, and the percentage of unused numbers can easily be detected via the API
  • The central limit theorem tells us, among other things, that a large enough random subset of a large data set will behave like its parent set with a high degree of statistical confidence
We downloaded just under 2 million tweets from about 50,000 users to conduct this analysis. As before, one restriction we should note is that we were only able to download the most recent 3,200 tweets for each user. This means we may be missing part of the data for “power users” who have sent over 3,200 tweets (they represent less than a tenth of a percent of the Twitter population).

Number of Twitter Users

By leveraging the auto-incrementing ID numbers used by Twitter and our ability to predict the ratio of used to unused IDs, we identified the following data on new Twitter users by month:
As you can see, the number of new users per month is currently at about 6.2 million. This is an enormous number, but it is about 20% lower than the July 2009 peak of 7.8 million. In fact, the past 6 months have shown steady decline in the number of new account registrations.
The chart below is is a cumulative version of the chart above. It shows us the remarkable growth experienced by Twitter in 2009:
Twitter’s hockey stick continues to blaze a trail upward and to the right. As we identified above, the recent data points are showing a linear, rather than exponential, growth trajectory. Twitter ended 2009 with just over 75 million active user accounts.

Average Number of Followers

This is the area where we saw the most change from the August data. According to the data, the average Twitter user has 27 followers, down from 42 followers in August 2009. The distribution of users by follower count is shown below:
Back in August, the “0 Followers” piece of the pie was about 20%. Now it’s closer to 25%. A likely reason for the drop in average number of followers is Twitter’s rapid growth rate. A third of Twitter’s user base has joined up in the past 4 months, and we know (as shown in the chart below) that users acquire more followers the longer they are on the system.
As long as Twitter is acquiring new users at such a rapid rate compared to its average historical month, the average number of followers will be pushed downward by the “youngness” of the average user and the average number of followers will continue to drop. However, it is impossible to tell from this chart if the small stature of the 2009 bar is only due to user age or if additional variables (such as a change in user engagement levels) are at play.
To find out the truth, we will incorporate user engagement data into our analysis. A reliable way of quantifying user engagement is by studying Twitter’s most measurable user activity: tweeting.

Number of Tweets

Below we show a distribution of Twitter users by the number of status updates (“tweets”) they have ever sent.
As before, the “youngness” of the Twitter user population is surely skewing this data toward lower numbers, but even still the numbers we see are quite astounding: about 80% of all Twitter users have tweeted fewer than ten times. This is up from the 75% we detected when analyzing data through August 2009.
As you might expect, the average number of Tweets increases over a user’s lifetime. This is demonstrated below, where we show the average number of Tweets sent by the user’s join year.

Active Tweeters

Twitter has a massive number of user accounts, but we now know that a large percentage of them aren’t active. The chart below, which shows the percentage of registered accounts that sent at least one tweet each month, helps us reconcile these facts and quantify how engagement may be changing over time.
The percentage averages around 20% of accounts, although it was above 50% in Twitter’s earliest days. One concerning trend, however, is that this metric has consistently declined over the past six months, and is currently at an all-time low of 17%.
Note that, due to Twitter’s rapid user growth, the absolute number of users who tweeted that same month is probably one of the company’s highest ever, despite this all-time low percentage.

Cohort Analysis

We can use a cohort analysis to look at user behavior and loyalty over time. Below, we show five “cohorts,” each representing a specific week in Twitter’s history. A cohort consists of every user who made their first tweet in the specified week. The lines in this chart show what percentage of those users come back and tweet again in each subsequent week.
While there is a sizable usage dropoff in week 2, repeat tweeting then holds predictably steady at around 20% of the cohort. This is consistent with the findings in our previous analysis.
To take things a step further, we can define the y-axis of the chart to show the number of tweets sent across everyone in the cohort (rather than just the number of people in the cohort who sent anything). This will help show the total content contribution of the cohort in subsequent time periods. We group cohorts by month in this case:
This image alone shows us why Twitter remains a powerhouse despite the high percentage of inactive users.
First, despite the fact that only 20% of tweeters come back to tweet in their second month, those who do come back tweet so much that it makes up for all the people who left.
Second, users who joined more recently (the 2009 cohorts) tweet with far greater frequency in their first few months than their 2008 counterparts. This means that active users are actually becoming more engaged over time.

Conclusion

Analyzing Twitter is like a roller coaster ride:
  • When you look at new account registrations, no one can deny that Twitter is still growing like a rocketship (that’s good).
  • However, upon closer inspection, the rate of new user signups has dropped meaningfully from its peak and many new users never do anything with their accounts (that’s bad).
  • Furthermore, the percentage of accounts sending out tweets has steadily declined over the past six months (that’s worse).
  • However, our cohort analysis reveals tremendous loyalty and engagement from those Twitter users who stay on the system after their first week as members (that’s good).
  • In fact, those users who stay become more active over time, so much so that they make up for the missing activity from those users who leave (that’s incredibly good).
And, with 75 million total accounts, an active userbase of around 20% still leaves around 15 million highly active tweeters.
The data we pulled from Twitter’s API found a good home inside the RJMetrics dashboard, and your company’s data can too. We would love to share how to capture real value from the data in your backend database using RJMetrics. Try out our online demo to learn more.

HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog


The numbers this fall aren't good.
After a high above 14,000 last year, the Dow is now thrashing around well below 9,000. The U.S. government is spending over $700 billion to buy unprecedented stakes in the nation's largest banks. Many industries, including technology, are hemorrhaging jobs.
This post isn't about all that. It's about the silver lining -- the fact that, just as we saw eight years ago when the first Internet bubble burst, financial pressure is now forcing companies to make changes. And just like last time, these changes are laying the foundation for a new, more efficient period of Internet growth.
In 2001, when the last downturn began, businesses began shifting some of their marketing dollars to search engine advertising. It was more measurable and targeted than display advertising, so it was appealing to marketers with tight budgets.

 
As we enter a second Internet downturn, businesses are again seeking efficiency. They're shifting money out of expensive paid search advertising, and into optimization, content and social media that help them get found in organic search results.
These changes are laying the foundation for a new era of marketing on the web - the Inbound Marketing era.

What Is Inbound Marketing?

Inbound Marketing is marketing focused on getting found by customers.
In traditional marketing (outbound marketing) companies focus on finding customers. They use techniques that are poorly targeted and that interrupt people. They use cold-calling, print advertising, T.V. advertising, junk mail, spam and trade shows.
Technology is making these techniques less effective and more expensive. Caller ID blocks cold calls, TiVo makes T.V. advertising less effective, spam filters block mass emails and tools like RSS are making print and display advertising less effective. It's still possible to get a message out via these channels, but it costs more.
Inbound Marketers flip outbound marketing on its head.
Instead of interrupting people with television ads, they create videos that potential customers want to see. Instead of buying display ads in print publications, they create their own blog that people subscribe to and look forward to reading. Instead of cold calling, they create useful content and tools so that people call them looking for more information.
Instead of driving their message into a crowd over and over again like a sledgehammer, they attract highly qualified customers to their business like a magnet.

inbound marketing

The most successful Inbound Marketing campaigns have three key components:
(1) Content - Content is the substance of any Inbound Marketing campaign. It is the information or tool that attracts potential customers to your site or your business.
(2) Search Engine Optimization - SEO makes it easier for potential customers to find your content. It is the practice of building your site and inbound links to your site to maximize your ranking in search engines, where most of your customers begin their buying process.
(3) Social Media - Social media amplifies the impact of your content. When your content is distributed across and discussed on networks of personal relationships, it becomes more authentic and nuanced, and is more likely to draw qualified customers to your site.

inbound marketing
 


Why Inbound Marketing Makes Sense in a Recession

As the economy slows down, companies are turning to Inbound Marketing because it is a more efficient way of allocating marketing resources than traditional, outbound marketing. As our CEO, Brian Halligan, puts it, when you're inbound marketing, the thickness of your brain matters a lot more than the thickness of your wallet.
There are three specific ways Inbound Marketing improves on the efficiency of traditional marketing:
(1) It Costs Less - Outbound marketing means spending money - either by buying ads, buying email lists or renting huge booths at trade shows. Inbound Marketing means creating content and talking about it. A blog costs nothing to start. A Twitter account is free, too. Both can draw thousands of customers to your site.  The marketing ROI from inbound campaigns is higher.
(2) Better Targeting - Techniques like cold-calling, mass mail and email campaigns are notoriously poorly targeted. You're reaching out to individuals because of one or two attributes in a database. When you do Inbound Marketing, you only approach people who self-qualify themselves. They demonstrate an interest in your content, so they are likely to be interested in your product.
(3) It's an Investment, Not an Ongoing Expense - When you buy pay-per-click advertising on search engines, its value is gone as soon as you pay for it. In order to maintain a position at the top of Google's paid results, you have to keep paying. However, if you invest that money in quality content that ranks in Google's organic results, you'll be there until somebody displaces you.

The Roots of the Inbound Web

Only in the past year and a half have the technology, the tools and the public's use of both evolved to the point where Inbound Marketing is practical.
In the early days of the Internet, there was no mainstream marketing. There were lots of experiments but few business buyers and consumers.
In the mid-1990s, as the first Internet bubble grew, companies began to follow their customers online. Tools for independent publishing were weak, so companies' online presence mirrored their offline presence. They sprayed advertising across mass media sites and prayed a few potential customers would see it.
When the dot-com bubble popped in 2001, marketers began to reassess the effectiveness of the spray-and-pray approach. They saw that consumers and business buyers were starting their purchase process less on mass media sites, and more on search engines. They discovered that in many cases targeted search-engine advertising was far more effective than display advertising on large media sites.
As spending poured into search marketing, a new era of Internet growth began. In addition to changes in Internet marketing, this phase of growth -- Web 2.0 -- produced significant changes in the way we use the web. It shifted from a read-only platform to one where anybody could publish, connect with friends and share content.
Now, as we enter a new economic downturn, online marketers are using the tools of this new read-write web to become more efficient. They're using social media, they're publishing content and they're optimizing it. They're becoming Inbound Marketers.

The Inbound-Marketing Secret? Empowerment!


Eight years ago, when the dot-com bubble collapsed, the idea of a single man using great content, social media and search engine optimization to build a New Jersey liquor store into a $50-million-a-year business in the course of two years would have been absurd.
Yet that's exactly what Gary Vaynerchuk has done since he launched Wine Library TV in 2006.
This is the power of Inbound Marketing.
With the tools that have become mainstream over the last two to three years, the scale of any business can be unlimited. If you have a great product and the skills to communicate with your customers, you can compete with the biggest advertising budgets.
That is exciting, and for small businesses it's empowering.


Posted by Rick Burnes on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 @ 09:01 AM

Top 10 Social Media Blogs – The 2010 Winners

Social Media Examiner • by Michael Stelzner • 5 hours ago


Tons of nominations came in.  Our panel of social media experts carefully reviewed the nominees and finalists. What follows are the winners of Social Media Examiner’s Top 10 Social Media Blogs for 2010.
If you’re looking to reap the rewards of social media, these rich blogs need to be at the top of your reading list.

  1. Chris Brogan: The Elvis of social media and the king of common sense, Chris Brogan is in a league of his own.
  2. Social Media Explorer: Social media all-star Jason Falls provides a fresh and interesting take on all things social media.
  3. Mashable: The world’s source for social media news, Mashable is the place to go for breaking stories.
  4. Convince & Convert: Jay Baer provides rich content for businesses seeking to embrace social media.
  5. Altitude: Amber Naslund offers a breadth of fresh air with smart, inspiring and personal social media insight.
  6. CopyBlogger: The king of engaging content, Brian Clark and his team help businesses persuade in a 2.0 world.
  7. Brand Builder: For businesses looking to dive deep into social media discussion, check out Olivier Blanchard’s rich insights.
  8. Diva Marketing: Toby Bloomberg’s blog provides a wide array of social media advice.
  9. Kikolani: Looking for great “getting started” social media guidance?  Then frequent this blog.
  10. Future Buzz: A nice mix of stories and reviews makes Adam Singer’s site one that should be on your radar.
Congratulations to the winners. Be sure to check out these amazing blogs!





The badge of distinction: If you’re a winner, feel free to post the image you see here on your blog and please link back to this page.
A special thanks to our judges! Thanks to Scott Monty (Ford), Ann Handley (MarketingProfs) and David Meerman Scott (author New Rules of Marketing and PR) for your participation.
Do you frequent any of these blogs? Share your comments below.

Jan 29, 2010

What Consumers Look for in New Tech


JANUARY 28, 2010 

Most feel marketers don’t understand their needs


A majority of consumers think technology has made life better in every area except personal relationships, according to the Philips Center for Health and Well-being.
Communication, information and medical treatments topped the areas of their lives that consumers felt were improved by technology. In addition, 64% of respondents said the Internet in particular had made life better, but only 26% said the same of social networking services such as Facebook, MySpace and Twitter.

Activities Made Better by Technology According to US Consumers, by Gender, December 2009 (% of respondents)

Consumers’ biggest concern was that technology be built to last, followed by good quality and the best price. Women were more interested than men in tech that could make life easier, save them time and let them express themselves through personalized features.

Importance of Technology Features According to US Consumers, by Gender, December 2009 (% of respondents)

Just under one-half of consumers reported that technology was easy to use, and a further 32% felt it had a good mix of advanced features and basic functions. In 2004, only 13% of respondents thought technology was easy to use, indicating a dramatic increase in users’ comfort level.
Respondents ages 18 to 24 found technology easiest to deal with, while those ages 55 and up were most likely to say it was too complex to operate. Men also reported more ease of use than women.
Growing comfort with technology has come hand in hand with an increase in respondents who believe tech companies understand their needs (37%). Still, a majority of consumers said companies make what they think will sell, and 39% thought manufacturers simply fell in love with their own ideas.
One-third of respondents reported a substantial disconnect with tech marketers, saying companies had no idea what their lives were like or what they would use. Notably, women were 7 percentage points more likely to say so than men.
Keep up on the latest digital trends. Learn more about an eMarketerTotal Access subscription today.
Check out today’s other article, “Baby Boomers Get Connected with Social Media.”   

Baby Boomers Get Connected with Social Media


JANUARY 28, 2010 

Living longer and richer lives, they go online to stay in touch


Baby boomers have always been good communicators, as evidenced by their presence at sit-ins, protests, demonstrations and “happenings” in the 1960s. So it was inevitable that boomers would check out social media sites.
“Creating and renewing personal connections online is the biggest draw for these boomers,” said Lisa E. Phillips, eMarketer senior analyst and author of the new report, “Boomers and Social Media.” “About 47% of online boomers maintain a profile on at least one social network, according to several sources. Their contacts include family, friends and co-workers of all ages.”
Burst Media reported that 47.5% of online boomer respondents had a social network profile in June 2009. In September of that year,Deloitte found 46% of boomer respondents said they maintained a social network profile—an important difference from simply creating one and forgetting about it.

US Internet Users Who Currently Maintain a Social Networking Site Profile, by Generation, 2007-2009 (% of respondents)

Boomers’ social network presence has grown steadily since Deloitte’s 2007 survey, when only 30% said they maintained a profile on a social network. In that period, millennials’ use of social profiles remained fairly steady—and heavily penetrated—at 71% in 2007 and 77% in 2009.
Facebook is the favorite social network for boomers, as bothcomScore and Anderson Analytics data show.

Social Networking Sites Used by US Social Network Users, by Generation, May 2009 (% of respondents in each group)

“Boomers expect that technology will help them live longer and better lives and keep them connected to family, friends, co-workers and, eventually, healthcare providers,” said Ms. Phillips. “To fulfill these expectations, boomers are turning to social media, where they keep up their offline social connections and make new ones. Online marketing messages that help them build on their connections—and foster other online relationships—will get their interest.”

The full report, “Boomers and Social Media,” also answers these key questions:
  • How many boomers are on social networks?
  • Do boomers use Twitter?
  • How do boomers use online video?
  • How can marketers reach boomers through social media?
To purchase the report, click here. Total Access subscribers, log in and view the report now.

Jan 28, 2010

Six Ways to Find Social Media Talent


9:00 AM Tuesday January 26, 2010 

RELATED PRODUCTS

As organizations move their social media strategies from theory to practice, they discover a difficult truth they must confront: Finding the "perfect" social media talent is practically impossible.
To start, the field is flooded with thousands of self proclaimed "experts" who have reinvented themselves to take advantage what looks like a growing business opportunity. Maybe they do know social media, but many don't. They need to be vetted.
More broadly, most candidates for social media positions fall at the ends of a spectrum. On one end is the person who really gets it and has deep expertise in social media, but lacks the potential to plug into your business culture. On the other end, there is the candidate with plenty of practical professional experience who will fit in easily with your culture, but who maybe doesn't have deep social media experience.
Ideally you'd find the candidate in the middle of that spectrum, but that's proving to be a remarkably rare individual. Trust me, I'm in the middle of a job search for this person and it's a time-consuming, intensive effort.
But in the process of hiring, I've learned some ways to help move the hiring process forward to attract some of the best and brightest emerging talent at all levels. Here are six emerging practices for hiring social media talent.
Empower anyone to recruit. Candidates deeply immersed in social media usually participate across multiple networks--likely the same ones that your employees use both professionally and personally. Empower employees to use their networks to uncover people who may be looking for an opportunity.
Leverage your beacons.Professional activities tied to social media are still relatively new and everyone is learning. That said, if your organization has individuals who are well known in the space, be sure to leverage their social and professional equity in the recruiting process. For example, if one of your employees earns a following in the social space, reward them by supporting their initiatives. Harness their passion for the benefit of your business. A shining light will attract others to it.
Go where they go. The professional world has been slow to embrace social media events such as "tweetups" (meetings organized by participants on Twitter) or conferences like South By Southwest, a kind of spring break for technophiles. But the reality is that these events attract social media enthusiasts--many of whom may become tomorrows corporate superstars.
Show off your case studies. Candidates in this field are typically familiar with the more publicized social media case studies (Ford, Zappos, Comcast, to name a few) and are hungry for more. If your organization has had success on either an internal or external initiative, don't be shy about touting it. But be sure it's something worth talking about. Also, be honest and forthcoming--share failures as well. If you aren't failing, you aren't doing.
Upgrade recruitment tactics and technology. Contract with recruiters who are extremely proficient in engaging with prospects across multiple networks. They must also be conversant with typical social media job descriptions. Make sure your technology infrastructure is upgraded to help recruit socially. For example, simply tracking the links to your job descriptions with a service calledbit.ly will show you not only how many times your ad was clicked on, but how the link was socialized and shared across a variety of networks. This data can provide valuable insights into the recruiting process.
Groom internal candidates. Don't forget you probably already employ good candidates for a social media job. They likely already have the cultural qualifications but perhaps lack knowledge or skills in social media such as being comfortable engaging with individuals in public. It's the responsibility of management to ensure that internal prospects can be trained and groomed for opportunities. This means potentially setting time aside for those who have the knowledge internally or bringing in expertise externally for assistance.
These are a few recommendations to consider as you look for quality people to make a social media strategy a reality at your company. If you have had success in recruiting and or training in this space, I'd love to hear what worked for you.

Word of mouth: measuring the share value of your brand and messaging

Posted by Nicole Green on 01/20/10



Quick – think about the last recommendation you shared. Maybe it was an amazing book or a movie? Maybe it was that new gluten-free brownie mix? Maybe it was a coupon you posted on your Facebook wall (when Teach For America, partners with The Gap for their annual Give & Get campaign, I forward the 30% off coupon to over 1,000 people)?
For women, sharing information (recommendations, experiences, advice) is important, but certainly not a purely altruistic act. Information is social currency. And while exchanging information is faster and easier than ever (copy, paste, click), information as social currency isn’t new. From medieval soothsayers to Gossip Girl, the woman in the know is the woman worth knowing.
But it’s not a numbers game. She’s only as “good” as the information she shares, and she’s highly selective. Before she “hits” send, she makes a rapid, but a critical calculation – one that determines if you’re sent or deleted.
We call this “share value.” And share value has never been more important now that the amount of information women have access to and their potential reach – thousands in a single click – have exploded. There are several factors women use to determine the share value of a ______________ (fill in the blank: brand, message, product, promotion, web-site, event). You can use this list to help evaluate the share-value of your current messaging or offering.
Here’s how to ensure your message is S.H.A.R.E.D.
  1. Save. Does the information offer her the opportunity to save or earn money? Helping others save money pays big dividends toward her own social value. But beware – women are digging for even deeper savings – women tell us 10% and free shipping offers don’t do it.
  2. Hurry. Urgency means more than a limited-time offer. Give her a compelling reason to act now – and make it fun. The Starbucks Free Pint of Ice Cream for Facebook Users promotion is a great example – with only 800 pints per hour up for grabs, the rush to participate was overwhelming, and those who scored, shared.
  3. Access and exclusivity. Help her show she’s connected and in the know while inviting others to the party. Get her to the front of the line, offer her new products and experiences before they’re available to the public and consider co-branded promotions that up the all-access-ante.
  4. Reward. What’s in it for her? How are you incentivizing her sharing? Give her a reason to keep your name on the tip of her tongue.
  5. Express. Simply, what does the information she’s sharing say about her? Consider the values or traits she wants to convey about herself: savvy, relevancy, cool, consciousness, kindness, multi-dimensionality, responsibility, creativity. Align your values to hers.
  6. Digital. It might seem obvious, but there must be a digital, mobile component to all of your messaging that makes it easy for her to send and share with as many people as possible, as quickly as possible.